What affects decision-making in Groups?

-

Are two heads better than one?

       It has been said that two heads are better than one, but is this true? Do people make better choices when they are surrounded by peers or are they better left alone? 

                                                       

 

 What is a group?

       Let us start with the most basic question. What is a group? A group is two or more people who share an evaluation of themselves and behave accordingly to said definition (Hogg & Vaughan, 2005). Unfortunately, it seems that working in groups has many negative effects. For example, when working in groups people tend to concentrate on things that they already knew, instead of exploring new ideas on a topic (Stasser et al., 1989; Stasser & Stewart, 1992). This effect gets worse when the teammates do not really know each other (Gruenfeld et al., 1996). Moreover, diversity on a team can also bring conflict (Mannix & Neale, 2005). This means that it may be better to work in a group in which you know everybody and they are similar to you.



(If you are interested in learning more about judgment and decision making, check out "Judgment and Decision Making" by David Hardman by clicking the picture or this link .)                                                                                                                                                                                                                     






What can affect decision-making in a group?

       There will be four factors covered that affect how groups make a decision. The first one is conformity. Asch (1956) demonstrated that people chose what the majority preferred if they were under pressure to conform. However, conformity is present even if team members are not pressured (Coultas, 2004), or physically present (Crutchfield, 1955). This type of behavior has even been observed in animals (Whiten et al., 2005). 

        The second factor is obedience to authority. And we all know who the authority is in this area of research: Stanley Milgram. Milgram (1963, 1974) demonstrated that people were capable of inducing lethal shocks just because someone with authority told them to do so. If someone in a position of authority can make you capable of killing someone, imagine the power of persuasion this type of people have over team members. 
                                                                         

       The third factor is minority influence. This is funny because we just talked about how people conform to the majority. The minority is more likely to influence a team if it is perceived as an expert on the topic (Thomas-Hunt et al., 2004), unless the minority is made up of only one team member (Mugny & Papastamou, 1980). The last factor covered is group polarisation. This refers to the concept that groups tend to choose extreme decisions, they either decide to take big risks (Wallach et al., 1962) or select safer options (Moscovici & Zavalloni, 1969). 

References

Asch, S. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monograph, 70(9); whole of issue 416.

Coultas, J. C. (2004). When in Rome... An evolutionary perspective on conformity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 70(4), 317-331.

Crutchfield, R. (1955). Conformity and character. American Psychologist, 10, 191-198. 

 Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y. & Neale, M. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 67, 1-15.

Hogg, M. A. & Vaughan, G. M. (2005). Social Psychology (4th edn). London: Pearson-Prentice Hall.

 Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31-55.

 Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.

 Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. London: Tavistock.

 Moscovice, S. & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125-135.

 Mugny, G. & Papastamou, S. (1980). Minority influence and psycho-social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 379-394

 Stasser, G. & Stewart, D. D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem vs. making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.

 Stasser, G., Taylor, L. A. & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67-68.

 Thomas-Hunt, M., Ogden, T. & Neale, M. (2003). Who's really sharing: Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Science, 49, 464-477.

 Wallach, M. A., Kogan, N. & Bem, D. J. (1962). Group influence on individual risk taking. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 75-86

 Whitem, A., Horner, V. & de Waal, F. B. M. (2005). Conformity to cultural norms of tool use in chimpanzees. Nature, 437(September), 737-740.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Psychoanalytic Therapy

-
Image
A comparison between psychoanalysis, medication, and cognitive-behavioral therapy. The effectiveness of medication, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and psychoanalysis will be compared to each other in order to describe the most helpful form of treatment. Effectiveness is going to be measured by the effect sizes and the limitations of each treatment; success is going to be measured by relapse and remission rates as well as the increase or decrease of benefits over time and side effects. The first form of treatment that will be explored revolves around psychopharmacology. The article “Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy” will provide the effect sizes of antidepressants, the number of positive and negative published and unpublished studies done by the FDA, and it will compare the long--term outcomes of using medication as a form of treatment. Turner, along with the other authors, looked at all registered FDA antidepressant studie...
Read more

The Five Lectures of Freud: An Introduction to Psychoanalysis

-
Image
     Sigmund Freud, a neurologist and the founder of psychoanalysis, made his first and only trip to the United States in 1909  (Jay, 2016).  Stanley Hall, who  was the first person to receive a PhD degree in psychology in the U.S., and the first president of the American Psychological Association, had invited Freud to  Clark University to lecture on psychoanalysis ( Encyclopædia Britannica, 2016c) . The lectures were part of the university celebrating its twentieth anniversary in which prominent figures spoke about their field (Burnham, 2012). The purpose of this essay is to explore each of Freud’s lectures in detail  in order to introduce psychoanalysis.      Before describing the lectures, it is important to understand how Freud mapped the mind. He divided it into three parts twice. The first time, he categorized it into the conscious, preconscious, and unconscious (Freud, 1938). The conscious layer contains everything tha...
Read more

Introduction to Neuroanatomy - Part 3 (Brain Structures - Telencephalon and Diencephalon)

-
Image
Brain Structures and their Functions To learn more about neuroanatomy, please check out: "Neuroanatomy Text and Atlas," by John H. Martin. In the last post, we ended explaining the development of the spinal cord. We will continue this discussion by exploring the structures of the brain from a bottom-up perspective and describe their functions.  Cranial and Non-cranial Nerves If you read the last post (Here is the link:  http://hbookreviews.blogspot.com/), you should remember that the spinal cord was divided by two plates: basal and alar. When we move up from the spinal cord into the brain we would observe a collection of structures known as the brainstem. In here, the plates become nerves. The alar plate becomes the cranial nerve sensory nuclei and the basal becomes the cranial nerve motor nuclei. Remember that a nerve is a bundle of axons in the central nervous system (CNS) and that nuclei are a collection of cell bodies that are also located ...
Read more